Skip to content

Reflections of a working writer and reader

 

 

Zadie Smith on Reading and Writing

I don’t write that much. There are people who write every day, and it’s part of their life, and I go for months, and recently years, without writing fiction, for example. For me, it is not a matter of daily survival. And I’ve heard writers speak of something that they can’t help but do. The only thing I can’t help but do is read. If I don’t read every day I’m just completely doomed. I think the more effective question for me is what does reading do for you because it’s reading that I am really addicted to. Writing is a kind of outgrowth of that passion.

OK, what does reading do for you?

I’m just completely addicted to it. Nothing will stop me doing it. I realize now with my baby, I’m breast feeding her and all I do is read all the time. My husband reminded me, “You know you have to speak to the child occasionally” – because otherwise, she might never learn to speak! She’s used to just sitting on my lap and then when I turn a page, she jerks. That will be her childhood memory: this page-turning noise. So I don’t know, it’s something that allows me not to be myself, or allows me to be in other places among other people, and I get great joy out of good sentence making. Nothing makes me happier. I usually spend the mornings reading and then I do my best to write something in the afternoon. The afternoon thing almost never happens, whereas the morning thing always happens.

Extracted from Eleanor Wachtel In Conversation with Zadie Smith; from Brick Magazine No. 85
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

5 Responses to “Zadie Smith on Reading and Writing”

  1. Jim Murdoch says:

    I sometimes wonder about being a writer because a) I can also go for long stretches without writing and b) I find reading hard work most of the time. I think that’s one of the reasons I wanted my daughter to develop a love for reading early in life. I’d bought her 100 books before she was even born. And it was a success although having a mother who was a voracious readers no doubt helped. I’m not sure what it is with me and reading. Neither of my parents read – I never saw one of them open a novel – although my dad did read us books at bedtime. I’m an impatient reader. I like authors to get to the point. I hate books where you can pass over whole paragraphs and feel like you’ve missed nothing. That’s why I never read more than about 40 pages at a time because I start to skip chunks. It’s also why I read so many novellas.

  2. john baker says:

    I can’t go for long stretches without writing, though I can go for a very long time with only writing a small amount. Since finishing writing my last novel there’ve only been a couple of occasions when I’ve thought of writing another one; but I still wake up in the morning with a head-full of words that need to be written down.
    I’ve written some short-stories and will continue with others.
    Reading, on the other hand seems to be a continuous process. I don’t leave a gap between finishing one novel and beginning another, but I also don’t waste any time on continuing with the reading of something that isn’t working for me.
    And, oh yes, novellas are certainly the way forward. I want to write one of those.

  3. Rachel Fox says:

    I’m a big fan of the Smith! And not writing too much is probably one reason I like her.
    x

  4. john baker says:

    It’s an interesting article, Rachel, if you can manage to take a look.

  5. Rachel Fox says:

    I’ve just started reading ‘Changing my mind’ – one of mum’s books (she was a fan too).
    x

Leave a Reply

Your personal details will never be shared.

Try to be cool in your comments. That doesn't mean you can't be critical, but if you're rude, your stuff will be deleted. Please use your real name and not your business name and don't put your website address in the comment text, as both appear like spam. Thanks for adding to the conversation.

Follow comments to this post by subscribing to the comment feed.