<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waiting for Galatea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/waiting-for-galatea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/waiting-for-galatea/</link>
	<description>Reflections of a working writer and reader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:37:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/waiting-for-galatea/comment-page-1/#comment-105043</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/waiting-for-galatea/#comment-105043</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a gem as is.

&lt;strong&gt;jb:&lt;/strong&gt; (blushing pink)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a gem as is.</p>
<p><strong>jb:</strong> (blushing pink)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/waiting-for-galatea/comment-page-1/#comment-104346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Murdoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/waiting-for-galatea/#comment-104346</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed this piece especially the metaphor and the way you built on it. I want to say it reads, the metaphor that is, like something McIlvanney would have written but since I&#039;m reading &#039;Weekend&#039; at the moment it&#039;s like I&#039;ve got this flavour in my mouth that brings out the McIlvanney in everything. 

My first reaction to the piece as a whole is that it needs more. On second reading I realise that that&#039;s just me wanting more. An important distinction. The hard thing in a piece as brief as this is to know just how much you can get away with not saying. It&#039;s a hard call but I think it works.

&lt;strong&gt;jb says&lt;/strong&gt;:  All of these are questions for me, Jim. It&#039;s nice to experiment with short forms, though. I&#039;m more attuned to the long haul where there is space to develop things slowly. I&#039;m only now realising how important word-choice is in short pieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed this piece especially the metaphor and the way you built on it. I want to say it reads, the metaphor that is, like something McIlvanney would have written but since I&#8217;m reading &#8216;Weekend&#8217; at the moment it&#8217;s like I&#8217;ve got this flavour in my mouth that brings out the McIlvanney in everything. </p>
<p>My first reaction to the piece as a whole is that it needs more. On second reading I realise that that&#8217;s just me wanting more. An important distinction. The hard thing in a piece as brief as this is to know just how much you can get away with not saying. It&#8217;s a hard call but I think it works.</p>
<p><strong>jb says</strong>:  All of these are questions for me, Jim. It&#8217;s nice to experiment with short forms, though. I&#8217;m more attuned to the long haul where there is space to develop things slowly. I&#8217;m only now realising how important word-choice is in short pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
