<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vonnegut to Willeford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/vonnegut-to-willeford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/vonnegut-to-willeford/</link>
	<description>Reflections of a working writer and reader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles J. Shields</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/vonnegut-to-willeford/comment-page-1/#comment-111613</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles J. Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=3449#comment-111613</guid>
		<description>For the biography of Vonnegut I&#039;m writing, due out next year from Henry Holt &amp; Co., I&#039;ve read hundreds of letters written by Kurt and I can tell when he&#039;s blowing smoke (no pun).

&quot;You are an absolute first-rate ethnographer in describing survival schemes within chaos which only politicians would be cynical enough to call a society.&quot; Typical Vonnegut-speak, suitable for in various forms for graduations and interviews.

&quot;What are you? A writer of thrillers, right?&quot; Does that indicate he knows Willeford&#039;s work?

&quot;Meanwhile, there are all these serious writers, describing America as it really is. Shall I name some of them? Would you like me to send you some of their wonderful books?&quot; Willeford needs to be tutored by a writer of fantasy? Isn&#039;t this a tad patronizing?

I stand by what I said.

Best,

Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the biography of Vonnegut I&#8217;m writing, due out next year from Henry Holt &amp; Co., I&#8217;ve read hundreds of letters written by Kurt and I can tell when he&#8217;s blowing smoke (no pun).</p>
<p>&#8220;You are an absolute first-rate ethnographer in describing survival schemes within chaos which only politicians would be cynical enough to call a society.&#8221; Typical Vonnegut-speak, suitable for in various forms for graduations and interviews.</p>
<p>&#8220;What are you? A writer of thrillers, right?&#8221; Does that indicate he knows Willeford&#8217;s work?</p>
<p>&#8220;Meanwhile, there are all these serious writers, describing America as it really is. Shall I name some of them? Would you like me to send you some of their wonderful books?&#8221; Willeford needs to be tutored by a writer of fantasy? Isn&#8217;t this a tad patronizing?</p>
<p>I stand by what I said.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/vonnegut-to-willeford/comment-page-1/#comment-111606</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=3449#comment-111606</guid>
		<description>A writer much missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A writer much missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles J. Shields</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/vonnegut-to-willeford/comment-page-1/#comment-111605</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles J. Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=3449#comment-111605</guid>
		<description>What this letter indicates to me is that it&#039;s canned and Vonnegut never read Willeford.

&lt;strong&gt;jb says&lt;/strong&gt;: Thanks for the comment, Charles. I don&#039;t agree, having read most of the output of both of them. Also, I can&#039;t imagine Vonnegut passing over someone of Willeford&#039;s talent.
There are also many other letters in the Willeford Archive, several from writers like James Lee Burke, Elmore Leonard and Tony Hillerman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this letter indicates to me is that it&#8217;s canned and Vonnegut never read Willeford.</p>
<p><strong>jb says</strong>: Thanks for the comment, Charles. I don&#8217;t agree, having read most of the output of both of them. Also, I can&#8217;t imagine Vonnegut passing over someone of Willeford&#8217;s talent.<br />
There are also many other letters in the Willeford Archive, several from writers like James Lee Burke, Elmore Leonard and Tony Hillerman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

