<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stunningly Tedious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/stunningly-tedious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/stunningly-tedious/</link>
	<description>Reflections of a working writer and reader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:23:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/stunningly-tedious/comment-page-1/#comment-109697</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=1249#comment-109697</guid>
		<description>Cormac McCarthy! Slowly I turn, step by step... But seriously, Cormac McCarthy is one of the most egregiously overrated American writers I&#039;ve ever had the displeasure of reading. I&#039;ve tried several times to finish one of his books -- mainly at the urging of friends who insist that I&#039;m wrong about him -- but I just can&#039;t do it. His preposterously flowery and overwrought style is so terrible that it would be laugh out loud funny if it weren&#039;t so aesthetically offensive. And all the gore and violence seem like just a smoke screen for a fundamental lack of storytelling talent.

As for the article, I agree with some of the choices, but when people start throwing out Dostoevsky and Cervantes it starts to become clear that many of those questions don&#039;t know what they&#039;re talking about.

&lt;strong&gt;jb says&lt;/strong&gt;: Snap, Shawn. I never managed to finish a Cormac McCarthy book either. Maybe we have the same friends, who assure me, also, that I&#039;m missing something special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cormac McCarthy! Slowly I turn, step by step&#8230; But seriously, Cormac McCarthy is one of the most egregiously overrated American writers I&#8217;ve ever had the displeasure of reading. I&#8217;ve tried several times to finish one of his books &#8212; mainly at the urging of friends who insist that I&#8217;m wrong about him &#8212; but I just can&#8217;t do it. His preposterously flowery and overwrought style is so terrible that it would be laugh out loud funny if it weren&#8217;t so aesthetically offensive. And all the gore and violence seem like just a smoke screen for a fundamental lack of storytelling talent.</p>
<p>As for the article, I agree with some of the choices, but when people start throwing out Dostoevsky and Cervantes it starts to become clear that many of those questions don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p><strong>jb says</strong>: Snap, Shawn. I never managed to finish a Cormac McCarthy book either. Maybe we have the same friends, who assure me, also, that I&#8217;m missing something special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/stunningly-tedious/comment-page-1/#comment-109696</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Murdoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=1249#comment-109696</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d let John Fowles off the hook purely for &#039;The Collector&#039;. I&#039;ve never been able to get into anything else he&#039;s written. I actually bought &#039;The Tree&#039; a while back because it was very short and I couldn&#039;t even get into that. But &#039;The Collector&#039; was such a wonderful approach to a book, tell the came story twice, once from the captor&#039;s perspective and once from the captives, tag on a coda and you&#039;ve got a pretty decent novel.

&lt;strong&gt;jb says&lt;/strong&gt;: I don&#039;t know &lt;em&gt;The Collector&lt;/em&gt;, but I revisited &lt;em&gt;The Magus&lt;/em&gt; recently and gave it up less than an hour in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d let John Fowles off the hook purely for &#8216;The Collector&#8217;. I&#8217;ve never been able to get into anything else he&#8217;s written. I actually bought &#8216;The Tree&#8217; a while back because it was very short and I couldn&#8217;t even get into that. But &#8216;The Collector&#8217; was such a wonderful approach to a book, tell the came story twice, once from the captor&#8217;s perspective and once from the captives, tag on a coda and you&#8217;ve got a pretty decent novel.</p>
<p><strong>jb says</strong>: I don&#8217;t know <em>The Collector</em>, but I revisited <em>The Magus</em> recently and gave it up less than an hour in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
