BLOG   ABOUT   MY-BOOKSHOP   ALL POSTS  MORE   

John Baker's Blog

Reflections of a working writer and reader

I might mention another embarrassment involved in the writer's habit of close attention. Once when I was driving through Colorado with a friend, traveling down a narrow mountain pass, we came upon an accident. A pickup truck and a car had collided, and from fifty feet away we could see the blood. We pulled over and ran to help. All the time I was running, all the time I was trying, with my friend's help, to pry open the door of the car in which a nine-months-pregnant woman had been impaled through the abdomen, I was thinking: I must remember this! I must remember my feelings! How would I describe this? I do not think I behaved less efficiently than my nonliterary friend, who was probably not thinking such thoughts; in fact, I may possibly have behaved more swiftly and efficiently, trying in my mind to create a noble scene. Nonetheless, what I felt above all was disgust at my mind's detachment, its inhumane fascination with the precise way the blood pumped, the way flesh around a wound becomes instantly proud, that is, puffed up, and so on. I would have been glad at that moment to be a literary innocent. John Gardner

More Loose Ends Than A Grass Skirt

Germaine Greer on who wrote Frankenstein; Or, the Modern Prometheus?

Literature courses in the US are oddly skewed towards novels because few undergraduates are required to read any poetry. If Lauritsen had read a sufficient quantity of poetry, he would know better than to state that the monster’s famous statement that he will “glut the maw of death” by killing all those whom Frankenstein loves, is pure Shelley, because it is, of course, pure Milton (Paradise Lost, Book 10).

Was it Mary or Percy? Germaine thinks Mary must have written it; after all, it’s so bad . . .

If you enjoyed this post, subscribe to my RSS feed

What next?

2 responses to “More Loose Ends Than A Grass Skirt”

  1. § Elizabeth Baines on April 12th, 2007 at 12:35 pm

    Well, as usual Greer is being provocative, and in danger of tying herself up in knots, but she’s not really saying that women write rubbish, she’s just using Lauritsen’s assumption against him to undermine his thesis:

    ‘The logic goes something like this: Frankenstein is a masterpiece; masterpieces are not written by self-educated girls and therefore Frankenstein cannot have been written by Mary Shelley. If Frankenstein is not a masterpiece, the thesis collapses.’

    jb says: Yes, that’s how I understood it, Elizabeth. I also don’t mind Germaine being provocative. She does it well.

  2. § Ian MacDonald on April 12th, 2007 at 4:52 pm

    I took the point of the paragraph to be that there’s someone teaching English literature (Lauritsen) who doesn’t know the basics of English literature (Milton). As to what you claim to be her opinion on who wrote Frankenstein, she says no such thing. I don’t think it’s Germaine who’s being provocative here, John.

    jb says: Germaine is taking Lauritsen to task for trying to rewrite literary history around his own sympathies.

Leave a Reply





Read extracts from my novels

Recent Comments