<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modernism XIII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xiii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xiii/</link>
	<description>Reflections of a working writer and reader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 08:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xiii/comment-page-1/#comment-116517</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=168#comment-116517</guid>
		<description>So, if we are constantly assuming different roles in different situations, can the roles we assume remain constant? That is, can we wear a personality that reacts to reality in the same way, despite changing circumstances, even though the true self (the creator of the personality) is changing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if we are constantly assuming different roles in different situations, can the roles we assume remain constant? That is, can we wear a personality that reacts to reality in the same way, despite changing circumstances, even though the true self (the creator of the personality) is changing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan anderson</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xiii/comment-page-1/#comment-116098</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=168#comment-116098</guid>
		<description>
I agree with your insight. Somebody famous said that the only permanent thing is change. I couldn&#039;t agree more. Since there will always be new innovations created in the future, the focus is on change and not on the person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your insight. Somebody famous said that the only permanent thing is change. I couldn&#8217;t agree more. Since there will always be new innovations created in the future, the focus is on change and not on the person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xiii/comment-page-1/#comment-1844</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=168#comment-1844</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s difficult to place a finger on our identity and say, &quot;this is who I am&quot; for in the following moments ones identity has already changed. However, it may be somewhat accurate to place our finger on &quot;change&quot; itself and say &quot;this is who I am&quot; for change seems to be the only consistant factor in us and life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s difficult to place a finger on our identity and say, &#8220;this is who I am&#8221; for in the following moments ones identity has already changed. However, it may be somewhat accurate to place our finger on &#8220;change&#8221; itself and say &#8220;this is who I am&#8221; for change seems to be the only consistant factor in us and life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

