<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modernism XI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xi/</link>
	<description>Reflections of a working writer and reader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: photography orlando</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xi/comment-page-1/#comment-134635</link>
		<dc:creator>photography orlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=139#comment-134635</guid>
		<description>I just like the helpful information you supply to your articles. I&#039;ll bookmark your weblog and check once more here regularly. I am relatively certain I&#039;ll be told lots of new stuff proper here! Best of luck for the following!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just like the helpful information you supply to your articles. I&#8217;ll bookmark your weblog and check once more here regularly. I am relatively certain I&#8217;ll be told lots of new stuff proper here! Best of luck for the following!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john baker</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xi/comment-page-1/#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>john baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=139#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the input, Napfisk. Good to see you in these parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the input, Napfisk. Good to see you in these parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Napfisk</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xi/comment-page-1/#comment-1586</link>
		<dc:creator>Napfisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=139#comment-1586</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always had a thing for 1928, though not strictly on a literary basis: &lt;i&gt;Point Counter Point&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Orlando&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Decline and Fall&lt;/i&gt;, Ravel&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Bolero&lt;/i&gt; and Mosolov&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Iron Foundry&lt;/i&gt;, Van Ostaijen&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Gedichten&lt;/i&gt; and Lemaitre&#039;s Big Bang Theory, not to mention Baird&#039;s television, Amelia Earhardt&#039;s flight and the first &#039;talkies&#039;:  and &lt;i&gt;Steam Boat Willy&lt;/i&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always had a thing for 1928, though not strictly on a literary basis: <i>Point Counter Point</i>, <i>Orlando</i>, <i>Decline and Fall</i>, Ravel&#8217;s <i>Bolero</i> and Mosolov&#8217;s <i>Iron Foundry</i>, Van Ostaijen&#8217;s <i>Gedichten</i> and Lemaitre&#8217;s Big Bang Theory, not to mention Baird&#8217;s television, Amelia Earhardt&#8217;s flight and the first &#8216;talkies&#8217;:  and <i>Steam Boat Willy</i>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john baker</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xi/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>john baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 16:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=139#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>I think it was originally called &lt;em&gt;Trimalchio&#039;s Banquet&lt;/em&gt;, then &lt;em&gt;Trimalchio in West Egg&lt;/em&gt;, and still later it became, briefly, &lt;em&gt;The High Bouncing Lover&lt;/em&gt; before Fitzgerald fixated on &lt;em&gt;Under the Red White and Blue&lt;/em&gt;. His editor, Maxwell Perkins, disregarded Fitzgerald&#039;s urgent telegrams on the matter, thought the title lacked sales appeal and changed it to &lt;em&gt;The Great Gatsby&lt;/em&gt;.
But the prize for this business of titles must go to Dickens, who called the book we now know as &lt;em&gt;Bleak House&lt;/em&gt;, &quot;Tom-All-Alone&#039;s Factory That Got Into Chancery and Never Got Out.&quot;
As they say, you couldn&#039;t make it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was originally called <em>Trimalchio&#8217;s Banquet</em>, then <em>Trimalchio in West Egg</em>, and still later it became, briefly, <em>The High Bouncing Lover</em> before Fitzgerald fixated on <em>Under the Red White and Blue</em>. His editor, Maxwell Perkins, disregarded Fitzgerald&#8217;s urgent telegrams on the matter, thought the title lacked sales appeal and changed it to <em>The Great Gatsby</em>.<br />
But the prize for this business of titles must go to Dickens, who called the book we now know as <em>Bleak House</em>, &#8220;Tom-All-Alone&#8217;s Factory That Got Into Chancery and Never Got Out.&#8221;<br />
As they say, you couldn&#8217;t make it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Liversidge</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xi/comment-page-1/#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Liversidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=139#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>Actually, I don&#039;t think he was that hot on working titles.  &quot;Trimalchio in West Egg&quot; doesn&#039;t quite have the resonance of &quot;The Great Gatsby&quot;, for me at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t think he was that hot on working titles.  &#8220;Trimalchio in West Egg&#8221; doesn&#8217;t quite have the resonance of &#8220;The Great Gatsby&#8221;, for me at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john baker</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xi/comment-page-1/#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>john baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=139#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re right to point this out. The two alternatives are quite different. Fizgerald was someone who loved language and used it meticulously. Consider this, for example, from the novel in question:

&lt;em&gt;Her bosom is still a pavement that she offers to the hoofs of many passing stallions, hoping that their iron shoes may strike even a spark of romance in the darkness....&lt;/em&gt;

His working title for the novel was &lt;em&gt;The Flight of the Rocket&lt;/em&gt;, later changed to &lt;em&gt;The Beautiful Lady Without Mercy&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right to point this out. The two alternatives are quite different. Fizgerald was someone who loved language and used it meticulously. Consider this, for example, from the novel in question:</p>
<p><em>Her bosom is still a pavement that she offers to the hoofs of many passing stallions, hoping that their iron shoes may strike even a spark of romance in the darkness&#8230;.</em></p>
<p>His working title for the novel was <em>The Flight of the Rocket</em>, later changed to <em>The Beautiful Lady Without Mercy</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Liversidge</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xi/comment-page-1/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Liversidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=139#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>I hate to sound like a real anorak but the actual title of Fitzgerald&#039;s novel is &quot;The Beautiful And Damned&quot;.  I know this because Fitzgerald is my all-time writing hero to the point of being obsessed with the guy.

The odd thing is that &quot;The Beautiful And The Damned&quot; sounds much more natural to me too, more balanced, almost poetic.  Over the years I&#039;ve even wondered if the book&#039;s title is actually grammatically correct.

Maybe you&#039;re right after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to sound like a real anorak but the actual title of Fitzgerald&#8217;s novel is &#8220;The Beautiful And Damned&#8221;.  I know this because Fitzgerald is my all-time writing hero to the point of being obsessed with the guy.</p>
<p>The odd thing is that &#8220;The Beautiful And The Damned&#8221; sounds much more natural to me too, more balanced, almost poetic.  Over the years I&#8217;ve even wondered if the book&#8217;s title is actually grammatically correct.</p>
<p>Maybe you&#8217;re right after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennyta</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modernism-xi/comment-page-1/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennyta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=139#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>An impressive line-up indeed. I loved The Wasteland, although when I studied it at A level, it was sadly wasted on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An impressive line-up indeed. I loved The Wasteland, although when I studied it at A level, it was sadly wasted on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

