<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modern Library Top 100 Novels of the 20th Century</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/</link>
	<description>Reflections of a working writer and reader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 9 Modern Novels Sites &#124; Hold Your Future</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-126275</link>
		<dc:creator>9 Modern Novels Sites &#124; Hold Your Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-126275</guid>
		<description>[...] Modern Library Top 100 Novels of the 20th Century &#124; John Baker&#039;s .Modern Library Top 100 Novels of the 20th Century. john baker, February 10th, 2007. 21 comments. Filed under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Modern Library Top 100 Novels of the 20th Century | John Baker&#039;s .Modern Library Top 100 Novels of the 20th Century. john baker, February 10th, 2007. 21 comments. Filed under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-111568</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-111568</guid>
		<description>As a product of a drug and gang banger infested public school (Los Angeles Unified), where a student&#039;s day is occupied by the thought of staying alive or not getting stabbed by avoiding  hallways, stairways, and restrooms, and later to sit for many years in watered down to appease the masses, State University classrooms, I would have to ask the question &quot;Have any of these books made an impact on my life?&quot; 

My arguement will be, most of the skills I now possess are self-taught. And the ability to read, which I began prior to any public eduction, I stick at the top. A number of these books have had a profound influence on my ability to make personal decisions. The #2 book, &quot;The Great Gatsby&quot; probably had the most impact on my life, helping end an obsession with a cocaine addicted woman, when I was young. And in a round about way changed my life. 

I would continue to argue reading a number of the books on the list, therefore would influence the way I would tell someone about by life, or how I would  tell a story. Many of the American author&#039;s-- Caldwell, Dreiser, Steinbeck, London-- have help this uncultured fool, without much in family, and often penniless to define himself. 

I believe this list to be a wonderfull starting point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a product of a drug and gang banger infested public school (Los Angeles Unified), where a student&#8217;s day is occupied by the thought of staying alive or not getting stabbed by avoiding  hallways, stairways, and restrooms, and later to sit for many years in watered down to appease the masses, State University classrooms, I would have to ask the question &#8220;Have any of these books made an impact on my life?&#8221; </p>
<p>My arguement will be, most of the skills I now possess are self-taught. And the ability to read, which I began prior to any public eduction, I stick at the top. A number of these books have had a profound influence on my ability to make personal decisions. The #2 book, &#8220;The Great Gatsby&#8221; probably had the most impact on my life, helping end an obsession with a cocaine addicted woman, when I was young. And in a round about way changed my life. </p>
<p>I would continue to argue reading a number of the books on the list, therefore would influence the way I would tell someone about by life, or how I would  tell a story. Many of the American author&#8217;s&#8211; Caldwell, Dreiser, Steinbeck, London&#8211; have help this uncultured fool, without much in family, and often penniless to define himself. </p>
<p>I believe this list to be a wonderfull starting point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Gordon</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-111110</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-111110</guid>
		<description>John

I agree with Susan above - the list presented in 1998 gave me the structure to work with. Today I have ordered from the bookshop &#039;Studs Lonigan&#039; and it will complete the full set for me. Very few presented a real challenge and boredom was never an obstacle, though I am not afraid to say the James Joyce deposited me in a wilderness!

I recall at the time each of the panelists insisting that a great many of their own personal choices were sadly &#039;traded off&#039; in order to get a concensus. So I&#039;m sure that a good number of those books mentioned by your correspondents would have been in the minds of the panel when reaching their final list.

I congratulate them on their choice and thank them for introducing me to world I never knew was out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John</p>
<p>I agree with Susan above &#8211; the list presented in 1998 gave me the structure to work with. Today I have ordered from the bookshop &#8216;Studs Lonigan&#8217; and it will complete the full set for me. Very few presented a real challenge and boredom was never an obstacle, though I am not afraid to say the James Joyce deposited me in a wilderness!</p>
<p>I recall at the time each of the panelists insisting that a great many of their own personal choices were sadly &#8216;traded off&#8217; in order to get a concensus. So I&#8217;m sure that a good number of those books mentioned by your correspondents would have been in the minds of the panel when reaching their final list.</p>
<p>I congratulate them on their choice and thank them for introducing me to world I never knew was out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-109892</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-109892</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s Cormac McCarthy?  &quot;Blood Meridian&quot;, &quot;Suttree&quot;, &quot;Child of God&quot; - masterpieces all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s Cormac McCarthy?  &#8220;Blood Meridian&#8221;, &#8220;Suttree&#8221;, &#8220;Child of God&#8221; &#8211; masterpieces all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrianne</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-109879</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-109879</guid>
		<description>Yes, the list is a compilation of the best English-language novels of the twentieth century, however, in and of itself, I feel that&#039;s completely absurd.

Some of the best, and most important books in American literature just so happen to have been written in another language initially, but this, in no way, should lessen or diminish the gravity of influence and enlightenment they&#039;ve lent to American literature, the American reader, and books, period!

It&#039;s been said before, our own lists&#039; would look quite different, and that&#039;s the beauty of reading- what we take from it is often unique and individual.

I just feel not being more inclusive, i.e. diverse, does an injustice to the universality of literature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the list is a compilation of the best English-language novels of the twentieth century, however, in and of itself, I feel that&#8217;s completely absurd.</p>
<p>Some of the best, and most important books in American literature just so happen to have been written in another language initially, but this, in no way, should lessen or diminish the gravity of influence and enlightenment they&#8217;ve lent to American literature, the American reader, and books, period!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been said before, our own lists&#8217; would look quite different, and that&#8217;s the beauty of reading- what we take from it is often unique and individual.</p>
<p>I just feel not being more inclusive, i.e. diverse, does an injustice to the universality of literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-109872</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-109872</guid>
		<description>As formerly established, the criteria for this list is originally published in English and written after 1900.  Lists are imperfect by nature, but speak to a consensus no matter how narrow.  Overall, Modern Library has compiled a list that is honest not only to the popular, but also to the artistic- by that I mean the novel that eludes the understanding of the population-at-large and who cannot appreciate its merits.  For me, Malcolm Lowry&#039;s Under the Volcano cannot be ranked high enough.  It is truly a unique, timeless modernist classic.  A couple items I would like to see here are Aldous Huxley&#039;s Island and Kurt Vonnegut&#039;s Cat&#039;s Cradle.  It is a shame that Oscar Wilde&#039;s The Picture of Dorian Gray barely misses the assigned window of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As formerly established, the criteria for this list is originally published in English and written after 1900.  Lists are imperfect by nature, but speak to a consensus no matter how narrow.  Overall, Modern Library has compiled a list that is honest not only to the popular, but also to the artistic- by that I mean the novel that eludes the understanding of the population-at-large and who cannot appreciate its merits.  For me, Malcolm Lowry&#8217;s Under the Volcano cannot be ranked high enough.  It is truly a unique, timeless modernist classic.  A couple items I would like to see here are Aldous Huxley&#8217;s Island and Kurt Vonnegut&#8217;s Cat&#8217;s Cradle.  It is a shame that Oscar Wilde&#8217;s The Picture of Dorian Gray barely misses the assigned window of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Literary Critic</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-109316</link>
		<dc:creator>The Literary Critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-109316</guid>
		<description>To me, &lt;em&gt;1984&lt;/em&gt; isn’t fiction – it’s a warning. The threat of political manipulation is always present, as long as the innate desire for power exists in man. We might be past 1984, but I’m not really quite sure we’re safe yet.

&lt;strong&gt;jb says&lt;/strong&gt;: It &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; fiction. That doesn&#039;t make it any less true, in fact, it probably makes it more so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, <em>1984</em> isn’t fiction – it’s a warning. The threat of political manipulation is always present, as long as the innate desire for power exists in man. We might be past 1984, but I’m not really quite sure we’re safe yet.</p>
<p><strong>jb says</strong>: It <em>is</em> fiction. That doesn&#8217;t make it any less true, in fact, it probably makes it more so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/comment-page-1/#comment-99010</link>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/modern-library-top-100-novels-of-the-20th-century/#comment-99010</guid>
		<description>This is the list of the best 100 books written in english since 1900. that&#039;s why Camus, kafka, proust, mann,... are not on the list even if they are some of the greatest writter ever.

&lt;strong&gt;jb says&lt;/strong&gt;: Hi Robin, thanks for that. But Camus wasn&#039;t born until 1913, so I guess most of his writings came &lt;em&gt;after &lt;/em&gt;that. Kafka&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Metamorphosis &lt;/em&gt;was published in 1915, and his other novels later still. Proust published the first part of &lt;em&gt;Remembrance of Things Past&lt;/em&gt; in 1913. And Thomas Mann&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Magic Mountain&lt;/em&gt; appeared in 1924. So they do qualify for the list, but they still didn&#039;t get on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the list of the best 100 books written in english since 1900. that&#8217;s why Camus, kafka, proust, mann,&#8230; are not on the list even if they are some of the greatest writter ever.</p>
<p><strong>jb says</strong>: Hi Robin, thanks for that. But Camus wasn&#8217;t born until 1913, so I guess most of his writings came <em>after </em>that. Kafka&#8217;s <em>Metamorphosis </em>was published in 1915, and his other novels later still. Proust published the first part of <em>Remembrance of Things Past</em> in 1913. And Thomas Mann&#8217;s <em>Magic Mountain</em> appeared in 1924. So they do qualify for the list, but they still didn&#8217;t get on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

