Learning to Write XXXI

How do you weed out characters that aren’t earning their keep?

A character doesn’t earn his or her keep when they do nothing interesting with or in opposition to the leading characters in your narrative. If they are your leading characters you need to stop writing and return to the stage of thinking about your novel. At some point in the future you will have to start again.

Usually, the subsidiary characters who aren’t making the grade fail in the ‘memorability test’. You don’t remember their names immediately, or when you come across their names you have to stop and think where you met them last. They are one-dimensional; in their company you are a little edgy on their behalf, wishing they would display one or two contradictions or character flaws.

If one of these characters has a secret, you know it won’t be worth much and you hope they manage to keep it under wraps. They probably will, too; because wall-flowers don’t have much to say for themselves.

Dull people in life may pay off after a while. Sometimes you have to be patient for a long time, waiting for them to prove you right. In fiction they never will. If they bore you, don’t inflict them on your readers. Write them out.

If you enjoyed this post, subscribe to my RSS feed




  1. Thomas McCay

    I recently had a very bitter experience with the subject of this post. When I doggedly finished my first detective novel I found that the lead character was the least interesting character in the book. I didn’t actually care what happened to him. The villains and the side kicks were much more interesting than the main character. I and my couple of readers cared more about the hero’s driver than we did about the bloody ‘hero’.

    I fear I kilt my baby and buried it in a deep dark drawer. I did not make the same mistake with my second baby. Many new mistakes but not that particular one. Characters must pay their way and they must have a solid reason for hanging on as more than ‘background performers’.

    New Reader, love this blog thanks.

    jb says: Hi Thomas, thanks for the contribution. It’s true that there’s no better teacher than experience, though he can be a very hard master sometimes.

Leave a Comment




Calendar

May 2008
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

About Writing:

The contextualist critic admits that the writer does indeed have, as the didactic critics insist, strong convictions and deep feelings about moral questions. And these convictions and feelings are often at the centre of his creative impulse. But he also sees that, when the writing is at its best, when the writer is caught up in his creation, these personal convictions and feelings are usually shaken. As W.H. Auden has said, the writer’s beliefs are “sacrificed to the poem.” As a result, when a modern critic examines the poem or the novel, he usually finds ambiguity and irony, ambivalence and paradox. To do otherwise, to insist as some critics still do, that a great work must furnish us with a noble idea, or an unambiguous morality, usually implies that we must sacrifice the poem to our beliefs. Lawrence H Hyman

Save a Blogger from Begging: Buy Stuff:

chinese jacket

Signed first editions
at special prices.


1965 feed subscribers

My Website

Visit my website for news of readings and appearances, reviews of and extracts from my novels, interviews, quotations on writing, revolution, lies, time and dance, art, serial killers, and humour. Read short stories, view author images and much more.

Submit your news

Please continue to let me know about literary-related news. I can't promise to publish everything, but if it grabs my interest . . .

Text Size

If you find the text of this blog too small or too large for easy reading, you can alter the size of the font in your browser controls. Alternatively, press the CTRL key and roll the mouse wheel forward or back.