<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JM Coetzee in York</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/jm-coetzee-in-york/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/jm-coetzee-in-york/</link>
	<description>Reflections of a working writer and reader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandhya Nambiar</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/jm-coetzee-in-york/comment-page-1/#comment-110946</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandhya Nambiar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=153#comment-110946</guid>
		<description>I am reading all of Coetzees works and oh my what an amazing man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am reading all of Coetzees works and oh my what an amazing man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spirulina</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/jm-coetzee-in-york/comment-page-1/#comment-110040</link>
		<dc:creator>spirulina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=153#comment-110040</guid>
		<description>I read Disgrace, and i am very impressed of this novel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Disgrace, and i am very impressed of this novel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john baker</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/jm-coetzee-in-york/comment-page-1/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>john baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=153#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Disgrace&lt;/em&gt; is a fine novel and a very good place to start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Disgrace</em> is a fine novel and a very good place to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polaris</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/jm-coetzee-in-york/comment-page-1/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>Polaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=153#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>Just yesterday, at the airport bookstore in SFO, I leafed through the first few pages of Disgrace. I think I would like to read Coetzee. Which book do you think is a good one to start with? 

I realize that it might be a little too late to leave a comment here, but I thought of asking anyway since I remembered reading this post last month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just yesterday, at the airport bookstore in SFO, I leafed through the first few pages of Disgrace. I think I would like to read Coetzee. Which book do you think is a good one to start with? </p>
<p>I realize that it might be a little too late to leave a comment here, but I thought of asking anyway since I remembered reading this post last month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/jm-coetzee-in-york/comment-page-1/#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 07:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=153#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Elizabeth Costello&lt;/i&gt; pushes the envelope of the novel altogether, for which Coetzee has been roundly criticised, as if a writer of his ilk might not know what a novel is &#039;supposed&#039; to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Elizabeth Costello</i> pushes the envelope of the novel altogether, for which Coetzee has been roundly criticised, as if a writer of his ilk might not know what a novel is &#8217;supposed&#8217; to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john baker</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/jm-coetzee-in-york/comment-page-1/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>john baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=153#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>This question of readers&#039; dependancy on categories is not easy to fathom. But it is patently true that publishers and booksellers, at least, believe that we won&#039;t buy their wares unless they put a label on each text describing it as &#039;literary&#039; or &#039;romantic&#039; or &#039;crime&#039;, etc. etc.
Within these categories, of course, there are sub-categories and sometimes sub-sub-categories. &#039;Noir&#039;, for example, describes a sub-category within the general &#039;crime&#039; genre. But you might well find historical-noir, or some such label, as the entrepreneurs within the publishing industry try another trick to tie you in to their latest offering.
After that there are the names of the individual writers, and these, as well as the other categories are all, in one sense, expressions of &#039;brand loyalty&#039;.
This situation has brought about the various initiatives, mainly through the library and reading-group communities, in reader development.
Reader development attempts to sell the reading experience and what it can do for individual readers, rather than selling individual books or genres or writers. 
It builds the audience for literature by moving readers beyond brand loyalty and helping them develop the confidence to try something new.
Reader development is also at the heart of the lit-blogging community. It involves active intervention to increase readers&#039; confidence and enjoyment of reading. It consistently opens up more reading choices. And it offers opportunities for people to share their reading experiences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question of readers&#8217; dependancy on categories is not easy to fathom. But it is patently true that publishers and booksellers, at least, believe that we won&#8217;t buy their wares unless they put a label on each text describing it as &#8216;literary&#8217; or &#8216;romantic&#8217; or &#8216;crime&#8217;, etc. etc.<br />
Within these categories, of course, there are sub-categories and sometimes sub-sub-categories. &#8216;Noir&#8217;, for example, describes a sub-category within the general &#8216;crime&#8217; genre. But you might well find historical-noir, or some such label, as the entrepreneurs within the publishing industry try another trick to tie you in to their latest offering.<br />
After that there are the names of the individual writers, and these, as well as the other categories are all, in one sense, expressions of &#8216;brand loyalty&#8217;.<br />
This situation has brought about the various initiatives, mainly through the library and reading-group communities, in reader development.<br />
Reader development attempts to sell the reading experience and what it can do for individual readers, rather than selling individual books or genres or writers.<br />
It builds the audience for literature by moving readers beyond brand loyalty and helping them develop the confidence to try something new.<br />
Reader development is also at the heart of the lit-blogging community. It involves active intervention to increase readers&#8217; confidence and enjoyment of reading. It consistently opens up more reading choices. And it offers opportunities for people to share their reading experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca Jane</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/jm-coetzee-in-york/comment-page-1/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=153#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post.  I read Coetzee&#039;s Elizabeth Costello and am still profoundly provoked by the character Costello and her idea that the Chicago stock yards were a model for the Nazi concentration camps.  How is it, exactly, that Coetzee gets away with pushing envelopes?  Three cheers for him!  Any idea of HOW he does it, or why it works for him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post.  I read Coetzee&#8217;s Elizabeth Costello and am still profoundly provoked by the character Costello and her idea that the Chicago stock yards were a model for the Nazi concentration camps.  How is it, exactly, that Coetzee gets away with pushing envelopes?  Three cheers for him!  Any idea of HOW he does it, or why it works for him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm &#187; Panning Martha</title>
		<link>http://johnbakersblog.co.uk/jm-coetzee-in-york/comment-page-1/#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm &#187; Panning Martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbakersblog.co.uk/?p=153#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>[...] Also, the veracity of this &#8220;memoir&#8221; has been called into question. Was her marriage as happy as she portrayed it? Or was it dissolving even as she wrote? Etc., etc. According to the introduction, she originally wrote it as a novel and no publisher would accept it. Only when she called it a memoir . . . sound familiar? John Baker commented yesterday that &#8220;we, as readers, depend on categories to shape our understanding of texts.&#8221; Certainly that&#8217;s true for this book. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also, the veracity of this &#8220;memoir&#8221; has been called into question. Was her marriage as happy as she portrayed it? Or was it dissolving even as she wrote? Etc., etc. According to the introduction, she originally wrote it as a novel and no publisher would accept it. Only when she called it a memoir . . . sound familiar? John Baker commented yesterday that &#8220;we, as readers, depend on categories to shape our understanding of texts.&#8221; Certainly that&#8217;s true for this book. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
