Double-take event

Home
About
On Writing
My Bookshop
Main Menu
Previous Posts
Subscribe to RSS feed
Winged with Death Reviews
When writers get (from readers or from themselves) criticism in the form "The story would be more believable if such and such happened" or "The story would be more interesting if such and such . . ." and they agree to make use of the criticism, they must translate it: "Is there any point in the story process I can go back to, and by examining my visualization more closely, catch something I missed before, which, when I notate it, will move the visualization/notation process forward again in this new way?" In other words, can the writers convince themselves that on some ideal level the story actually did happen (as opposed to "should have happened") in the new way, and that it was their inaccuracy as a story-process practitioner that got it going on the wrong track at some given point? ... In a very real way, one writes a story to find out what happens in it. Before it is written it sits in the mind like a piece of overheard gossip or a bit of intriguing tattle. The story process is like taking up such a piece of gossip, hunting down the people actually involved, questioning them, finding out what really occurred, and visiting pertinent locations. As with gossip, you can't be too surprised if important things turn up that were left out of the first-heard version entirely; or if points initially made much of turn out to have been distorted, or simply not to have happened at all. Samuel R. Delany

Double-take event

john baker, March 10th, 2007. One comment. Filed under art, theatre, writing.

Playwright Mike Kenny and myself had a public conversation last night in the York Central Library. This was one of the events of the York Literature Festival. John Baker & Mike Kenny

We spoke about the differing ways that one creates character for the novel and for the stage. Although there are many similarities there are also significant differences, mainly drawn from the fact that character on the stage is presented in human form by an actor, while in the novel it is a mere construction of words.

As a result of this event and the many conversations we have had recently, Mike and I have decided to team up to repeat the event (more or less) in other locations, libraries and literary ferstivals.

Might be coming your way soon. You can run, but you sure can’t hide.

Previous post: The Glass Menagerie – a review

Next post: Boeuf en Daube á la Virginia Woolf

One Response to “Double-take event”

Gorilla Bananas says:

11th March 2007 at 11:42 am

Very true. I would never trust a human to play me on the stage. A chimpanzee might just pull it off, but I’d rather play myself.

jb says: I knew I shouldn’t have published the photograph.

John Baker's Blog

Double-take event

One Response to “Double-take event”

Recent Comments

Most commented posts